California judge weighs Uber, Lyft driver classifications By Reuters

California judge weighs Uber, Lyft driver classifications By Reuters


© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A sign marks a rendezvous location for Lyft and Uber users at San Diego State University in San Diego

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) – California and three of its largest cities urged a state judge on Thursday to issue a preliminary injunction requiring Uber Technologies (NYSE:) Inc and Lyft Inc (NASDAQ:) to classify their drivers as employees rather than as contractors.

The argument was made at a hearing in San Francisco Superior Court in a May 5 lawsuit accusing Uber and Lyft of violating a new state law requiring companies to treat workers as employees if they control how the workers do their jobs, or the work is part of companies’ normal business.

Several hundred thousand “gig” workers, including many at ride-hailing companies and app-based food delivery services, are affected by the law known as Assembly Bill 5 (“AB5”), which took effect on Jan. 1 with broad support from organized labor.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and the cities of Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco have said classifying drivers as contractors deprives them of essential benefits such as a minimum wage, overtime, sick leave, unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation insurance.

They have also said it gives Uber and Lyft, which are not profitable, an unfair competitive advantage. California’s labor commissioner threatened on Wednesday to file similar lawsuits.

Superior Court Judge Ethan Schulman asked whether Uber and Lyft were correct that the plaintiffs wanted a “radical” restructuring of their businesses, perhaps entailing job losses.

“You don’t need to be worried,” responded Matthew Goldberg, a lawyer for San Francisco, saying the companies had “dramatically overstated” the potential fallout.

The companies have said most drivers would oppose being treated as employees, and Uber has said more than 150,000 drivers in California alone would lose work if it happened.

But Goldberg said such a classification would help ensure that drivers receive benefits not available under federal law.

“The full range of California safety net protections are what we think drivers are entitled to here,” he said.

Lawyers for Uber and Lyft are expected to argue against an injunction.

California is the biggest U.S. market for Uber and Lyft.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


About us

InvestLab is a financial services technology company focused on the global trading market. Founded in 2010 in Hong Kong, the company develops trading, market data, and social research products that enable individual investors and small to mid-size brokers to access global markets. We provide brokers and financial institutions cross border capabilities for retail investors into 43 markets globally.


CONTACT US

CALL US ANYTIME